Skip to main content

Example paid deliverable

GA4 Clarity Audit output

A deeper diagnostic review of GA4, GTM, ecommerce tracking, key events and reporting reliability, delivered with a written audit and video walkthrough.

Fictional sample client — Harbour & Field Homeware

This is a fictional example created to show the format and level of detail. It is not a client case study.

Executive summary

GA4 is collecting meaningful website and purchase data, but the current setup should not be treated as fully decision-ready.

  • Purchase events are present, but revenue reliability needs correction and validation.
  • Several key events are too broad to be useful as commercial conversion signals.
  • The GTM container contains overlapping tags that increase the risk of duplicate or inconsistent event collection.
  • Reporting currently overstates confidence because dashboard metrics are presented without caveats around attribution and ecommerce completeness.

Tracking confidence rating

5/10

Amber/red — useful signal, material risk

The data is not unusable, but it needs fixes before it should be used as the main source for budget, merchandising or optimisation decisions.

Walkthrough video included

The paid audit includes a recorded walkthrough explaining the findings, commercial implications and recommended fix order in plain English.

The purpose is not just to list issues. It is to help the business understand what matters, what can wait and what should be corrected first.

GA4 configuration observations

Priority 1

Revenue reporting needs validation

Purchase revenue is present, but the gap against Shopify order totals is too large to ignore. This needs a controlled reconciliation before revenue data is used in reporting.

Priority 2

Internal and test traffic controls are incomplete

Internal visits and test transactions appear likely to be included in standard reporting, which weakens confidence in conversion rate and revenue-per-user metrics.

Priority 2

Referral handling should be tightened

Payment and checkout-related referrals should be reviewed so that purchases are not incorrectly attributed to intermediary domains.

Key event and conversion review

Priority 1

Commercial key events are mixed with softer actions

The current key event list includes actions with very different commercial value. This makes conversion reporting harder to interpret and may inflate perceived performance.

Priority 2

Form and newsletter events need clearer naming

Lead, newsletter and customer-service actions are not separated cleanly enough. Recommended naming should distinguish revenue-adjacent actions from general engagement.

Priority 3

Event parameters need standardisation

Several useful parameters are present inconsistently. Standardising these would improve future analysis without requiring a full tracking rebuild.

GTM observations

Priority 1

Overlapping GA4 event tags

The container appears to contain overlapping event logic for some customer actions. This increases the risk of duplicate collection and inconsistent parameters.

Priority 2

Trigger conditions should be made more explicit

Some triggers rely on broad page or click conditions. Narrowing these would reduce accidental firing when templates or page components change.

Priority 3

Container documentation is limited

Tag and trigger naming is understandable in parts, but not documented enough for clean future maintenance.

Reporting and interpretation issues

Priority 1

Dashboard confidence is overstated

The current reporting presents revenue, conversion rate and channel performance as settled figures. Until ecommerce and attribution checks are complete, these should be labelled as directional.

Priority 2

Acquisition reporting needs clearer caveats

Channel-level reporting is useful, but it should not be used alone to judge performance while referral handling and key event quality remain unresolved.

Priority 3

Reporting should separate diagnosis from trading KPIs

A small diagnostic view would help the team spot tracking issues without cluttering the commercial dashboard.

Priority fix list

Priority
Fix
Why it matters
Owner
PriorityP1
FixReconcile GA4 purchases and revenue against Shopify
Why it mattersConfirms whether the core commercial reporting can be trusted.
OwnerAnalytics / ecommerce lead
PriorityP1
FixRemove or consolidate overlapping purchase and form event logic
Why it mattersReduces duplication risk and improves key event reliability.
OwnerGTM implementer
PriorityP2
FixSeparate commercial key events from engagement events
Why it mattersMakes conversion reporting more meaningful and less inflated.
OwnerAnalytics owner
PriorityP2
FixTighten referral exclusions and checkout/payment handling
Why it mattersImproves channel interpretation and attribution quality.
OwnerAnalytics / developer
PriorityP3
FixAdd a lightweight tracking-health view to reporting
Why it mattersHelps the team catch future data quality issues faster.
OwnerReporting owner

Recommended next actions

  • Fix and validate purchase/revenue tracking before treating GA4 as the trading source of truth.
  • Reduce the key event list to actions with clear commercial meaning.
  • Clean up overlapping GTM tags and make trigger rules more robust.
  • Add caveats to current dashboards until the P1 fixes are complete.
  • Run a short validation pass after implementation changes are made.

Scope limitations

This audit focuses on measurement reliability and interpretation. It does not include implementation changes unless separately agreed.

  • No legal assessment of consent compliance.
  • No guarantee of historic data correction.
  • No full dashboard rebuild unless scoped separately.
  • No open-ended support beyond the agreed deliverable.

Acceptance criteria for the priority fixes

The audit would normally be considered actioned when the following conditions are met:

  • GA4 purchase counts and revenue reconcile to an agreed tolerance against Shopify for a defined test period.
  • Only commercially meaningful actions are marked as key events.
  • Duplicate or overlapping GTM event logic has been removed or clearly isolated.
  • Payment and checkout referral handling has been checked and documented.
  • Reporting includes appropriate caveats until the tracking changes are validated.

Need this level of clarity for your own GA4 setup?

The GA4 Clarity Audit gives you a practical, prioritised view of what is reliable, what is broken and what to fix first.

Request a GA4 Clarity Audit